FA
FTAI Aviation Ltd. (FTAI)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q3 2025 delivered strong operational execution: revenue rose 43% year over year to $667.1MM, net income attributable to shareholders increased 46% YoY to $114.0MM, and Adjusted EBITDA reached $297.4MM; quarter-over-quarter softness vs Q2 owed to lapping one-time gains .
- Management raised 2026 segment Adjusted EBITDA guidance to $1.525B (from $1.4B), comprised of ~$1.0B Aerospace Products and ~$525MM Aviation Leasing, reflecting accelerated SCI deployment and MRE scale benefits; dividend increased to $0.35 per share (from $0.30) on strong free cash flow generation .
- Aerospace Products surged: Adjusted EBITDA of $180.4MM (+77% YoY) at ~35% margin; module production ramp (207 CFM56 modules, +13% QoQ) and operational efficiencies underpin trajectory to 40%+ margin in 2026 .
- Strategic Capital Initiative upsized to $2.0B of equity commitments (purchasing power >$6B), with 190 aircraft closed or under LOI and mid-2026 full deployment target; serves as multi-year committed engine exchange pipeline for Aerospace Products .
- Stock-relevant catalysts: guidance raise, SCI hard-cap close, dividend hike, and capacity-expanding MRO acquisition (ATOPS) plus accessory JV (Bauer) to insource high-cost repairs, cut per-visit costs by ~$75k, and expand throughput .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Aerospace Products delivered $180.4MM Adjusted EBITDA (+77% YoY) at ~35% margin; management expects 40%+ margin next year as parts procurement, PMA, and repair verticals mature: “we expect aerospace products margins to grow to 40% plus next year” .
- SCI vehicle upsized to $2.0B equity (>$6B purchasing power): “expanded partnership… portfolio size of ~375 aircraft… full deployment… by mid-2026” and 190 aircraft closed/under LOI, securing multi-year engine exchange demand .
- Free cash flow and capital returns: Q3 adjusted FCF of $268MM; YTD $638MM and 2025 target $750MM; dividend raised to $0.35 per share on surplus cash and strong trajectory to $1B adjusted FCF in 2026 .
What Went Wrong
- Sequential decline vs Q2 on non-recurring items: Q3 total Adjusted EBITDA ($297.4MM) below Q2 ($347.8MM), with CFO noting Q2 had $24MM settlement on Russian assets and seed portfolio sale gains; pure leasing EBITDA fell to $122MM in Q3 vs $152MM in Q2 .
- Leasing revenue normalization as seed portfolio transitioned to SCI: gains on sale contributed $50.1MM to 2025 leasing EBITDA at 10% margin; ongoing pivot to asset-light reduces on-balance sheet leasing income near term .
- Elevated interest expense persists: Q3 interest expense was $60.8MM; while manageable, the higher rate backdrop remains a headwind until refinancing or deleveraging dynamics change .
Financial Results
Consolidated Results (YoY, QoQ, and vs. prior periods)
Notes:
- Q3 2025 vs Q3 2024: strong YoY growth across revenue and profitability; net income attributable +46% YoY per press release .
- Q3 2025 vs Q2 2025: sequential decline driven by lapping Q2 one-time settlement and seed portfolio sale gains in leasing .
Segment Adjusted EBITDA
Segment/Mix and Operating Metrics
Operational KPIs
Guidance Changes
Rationale:
- SCI upsizing and committed MRE pipeline support higher Aerospace Products volume and margin; leasing mix shifts to asset management model with servicing fees and equity pickup .
- Dividend increase reflects strong adjusted free cash flow generation and surplus cash post growth investments .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- Joe Adams, CEO: “Our business had a strong quarter underpinned by continued growth in Aerospace Products allowing us to increase guidance for 2026 and raise our ordinary dividend… purchase over $6 billion of aircraft…” .
- Joe Adams on SCI and committed volume: “The MRA agreement… establishes a multi-year contractual pipeline of demand… full deployment of capital now anticipated by mid-2026” .
- Joe Adams on margin trajectory: “we expect aerospace products margins to grow to 40% plus next year as we optimize our parts procurement and repair strategies… PMA Part Number 3… approval… in the very near term” .
- Angela Nam, CFO: “Adjusted EBITDA of $297.4 million in Q3… comprised of $180.4 million Aerospace, ~$134.4 million leasing, and -$17.4 million corporate and other… pure leasing came in at $122 million for Q3 versus $152 million in Q2… Q2 included a $24MM settlement and seed portfolio revenue” .
- David Moreno, COO, on ATOPS and Bauer JV: “ATOPS… ability to process 150 modules… raises overall production… Lisbon facility… run our field service… Bauer JV… expected to deliver up to $75,000 in average savings per shop visit… ~350 engines per year when ramping in 2026” .
Q&A Highlights
- SCI implications: Analysts probed asset availability, pricing, and returns; management highlighted lessor and airline supply, sale/leasebacks as shop-visit alternatives, and superior risk-adjusted returns from MRE-driven engine exchanges; fee structure market-based (~1%+ mgmt fee, low double-digit incentive over hurdle) .
- Segment accounting and EBITDA treatment: Equity pickup for the 19% SCI stake appears in equity income; servicing revenue in leasing; all included in Adjusted EBITDA .
- Capacity and M&A strategy: Smaller, high-return acquisitions (e.g., ATOPS) add meaningful capacity at modest cost; Bauer JV insources high-cost accessory repairs to reduce turnaround times and improve margins .
- Free cash flow outlook and capital deployment: Targeting ~$1.0B adjusted FCF in 2026; growth investments prioritized, with continued evaluation of shareholder returns; maintenance capex expected around ~$125MM and replacement capex manageable under exchange model .
- V2500 program and demand: About halfway through 100 full-performance restorations; strong demand persists given GTF grounding dynamics; continued engagement and potential extension .
Estimates Context
- Q3 2025 vs S&P Global consensus:
- Revenue: $667.064MM actual vs $657.666MM estimate → modest beat *
- EPS (Primary): $1.1604 actual vs $1.2417 estimate → miss; diluted EPS in 8‑K was $1.10 *
- EBITDA: $263.755MM actual vs $280.750MM estimate → miss; company-reported Adjusted EBITDA was $297.381MM (non-GAAP definition) *
Values retrieved from S&P Global. Differences reflect S&P normalization vs company non‑GAAP definitions and share count methodologies.*
Implications:
- Revenue beat is modest; EPS and S&P EBITDA lag consensus, while company’s Adjusted EBITDA (non-GAAP) was stronger. Focus for models: reconcile S&P’s EBITDA basis with company’s Adjusted EBITDA and non-GAAP adjustments, and incorporate normalized equity pickup and intercompany eliminations .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Aerospace Products is the growth engine: accelerating volumes, improving margins, and a committed SCI pipeline support the raised 2026 EBITDA guidance to $1.525B; monitor PMA approvals, repair vertical ramps, and module throughput scaling to 1,000 in 2026 .
- Leasing mix shifts to asset management: servicing fees and equity pickup offset lower on-balance sheet leasing; fee economics (≈1%+ mgmt and low double-digit incentive) position the segment for durable, higher-multiple earnings streams .
- Free cash flow trajectory strengthens: Q3 adjusted FCF $268MM; 2025 target $750MM; 2026 target ~$1.0B supports ongoing dividend growth and potential capital returns while funding high-return capacity and repair initiatives .
- Near-term modeling updates: Normalize Q2 one-time items (settlement, seed gains), reflect Q3 leasing EBITDA reset, and incorporate SCI upsizing timeline (mid-2026 full deployment) into Aerospace Products demand assumptions .
- Watch execution milestones: ATOPS integration (Miami/Lisbon), Bauer accessory JV ramp (end of year start), Montreal/Rome productivity gains, and Finnair program rollout; these are key to margin and throughput targets .
- Estimates likely to adjust: modest revenue beat but EPS and S&P EBITDA miss suggest consensus tweaks; reconcile S&P vs company non-GAAP and equity/servicing flows to avoid double-counting *.
- Tactical catalyst stack: guidance raise, SCI hard-cap close, dividend increase, and visible capacity expansions underpin positive narrative momentum despite QoQ normalization from lapping Q2 non-recurring items .